Rights Issue Calculator
Calculate theoretical ex-rights price and compare subscription cash, equity and relative ownership under one fully issued offer.
Enter one pro rata offer in one currency. Choose the percentage of your theoretical entitlement to take up.
Theoretical fully issued comparison
Enter your position, offer and take-up, or load the worked example.
TERP and signed price gaps are theoretical. Actual trading prices, eligibility and settlement depend on the offer and market.
Shares and prices use up to 12 significant figures. Relative dilution measures the reduction in your prior ownership proportion. It does not show an absolute change in issuer ownership percentage points.
Understand TERP and relative dilution
Compare full, partial and zero take-up using the same reference quote and issuer share count.
Read the complete Rights Issue guideFormula and methodology
TERP = (O × P + N × S) / (O + N)
Entitlement = Q × N / O
Subscription cash = entitlement × F / 100 × S.
TERP weights the reference and subscription prices by O and N. The entitlement is Q × N/O. Multiply it by F/100 to obtain subscribed shares, then multiply by S for subscription cash. Post-issue equity is post-issue shares times TERP. Subtract subscription cash once for the net comparison. Relative ownership retained is 100 × (O + N × F/100)/(O + N).
Definitions
N new shares are offered per O old shares. Q is opening shares, P is the cum-rights reference price per old share and S is the cash subscription price per new share. F is the percentage of your pro rata entitlement you model taking up.
Verified worked examples
For 100 shares at 10, with 1 new share per 4 held at 6, TERP is 9.20 and the entitlement is 25 shares. At 40% take-up, 10 new shares cost 60. The 110-share position is worth 1,012 at TERP, or 952 net of cash. The modeled change is −48, and relative ownership dilution is 12%.
Interpretation
Compare equity and cash on the same fully issued basis. Full take-up preserves the prior ownership proportion and the modeled value net of cash. A lower price per share does not by itself describe ownership dilution. The signed price gaps use different share units, and neither is an executable quote.
Inputs and interpretation
Enter the eligible opening holding you want to model, a positive cum-rights price, subscription price, and the new-for-old offer terms. Enter take-up explicitly from 0 to 100%. Review the cash, share and relative ownership results separately.
Assumptions and limitations
The issuer adds all offered shares and receives all subscription cash. This assumption holds even if this shareholder subscribes for less. The model does not identify who fills the remaining offer or infer how a premium-priced offer could be filled.
Supported domain and common mistakes
Positive shares and cum-rights price and nonnegative subscription price are bounded at 1e9. Ratio terms are integers from 1 to 1,000,000. Decimal inputs allow 12 fractional places and 48 trimmed characters. Exact scaled integer ratios preserve signed gaps before 100-significant-digit conversion. Displayed shares and prices use up to 12 significant figures.
Do not use an already ex-rights reference quote, invert the offer terms, treat a premium gap as a negative traded rights quote, or compare equity without accounting for the subscription cash. Match currency and share units before entering prices.
Frequently asked questions
How is theoretical ex-rights price calculated?
Which ratio number goes first?
What does a 40% take-up mean?
Does full take-up prevent modeled dilution?
What happens when the subscription price is above the reference price?
Does the tool know my actual entitlement or rights sale proceeds?
Does the market setting change the calculation?
Sources and educational scope
Educational full-issue model. It does not infer actual allotment, broker rounding, transferability, sales, market prices, taxes, FX, fees, dates or eligibility. It does not recommend subscribing or selling.
Reviewed . AI-assisted content under operator editorial responsibility; no independent expert financial review is claimed.